Open Source Content Management System - An Overview
>> วันศุกร์ที่ 29 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2552
Publication of documents on the World Wide Web seems frightening for the so-called ludites it. Let's face it HTML, XML, CSS, JavaScript, only to mention that some of the technologies you need to know to make a real professional website for you or your company. Fortunately, there is a solution to this problem, a content management system and is a simple way unanyone preSqueez ready LDE Internet veröffentlichen.
Some of these content management systems from the need, the data from the Web. CNet, for example, one of them in the House of content management systems and yarn in a vignette. Since its publication on the Internet in 1995 to increase the development of these systems are really go. But my work is focused on the open source Web Content Management sytaLlosa.
The first open-source, I would like the name DotNetNuke (http://www. dotnetnuke.com), a AsP.Net. Far one of the most popular open source projects, DotNetNuke has an avid following of hundreds of thousands of users. The advantages of using this system is a rapid adjustment of the Plataforma and intensive support they receive from the community. These are two very important factors in evaluating a system of open sources of the deactualizaciones and support they received from the author or the users of the platform. In addition to the Innovations in this system, a powerful application of any measure. For example, the evaluation mechanism is by far one of the easiest to modify and adapt the programming and the limited number of tasks adore to receive a side weaving.
DotNetNuke is not without drawbacks. Since then, the Systementwickelt ASP.Net, it means that you have at least Visual Studio 2003 Professional or higher to make the source and the system under your bedürfnissen. That can be a disadvantage, since the cost of the development platform can honderdenos dollars.
The second open source system, I have some experience in the use of AXCMS.Net hot (http://www.axcms.net) in the platform. NHE. This system is that the kingdom of Other open-source systems such as DotNetNuke. But this system has drawbacks. Initially a little difficult for the installation and deployment issues that each project be seriously undermined. Moreover There is no pairECE is a strong user DotNetNuke. Nevertheless, the system as a "fixed" when you're rewarded for your efforts, once the system is fully installed and ready for use. Secondly, because this system estvraiment an opportunity on the development team all updates or adjustments to May, for a right of the creator of this system. This fact prevents the support of the community and the approval of the system, which makes it much more difficult.
There are many other open-source systems with more developed as I write this. The main factors, the introduction of an open source content management systems take into account sontQuelist this system for the support of the community and the timeliness of your heart of the development team. Even an open source system can aggregate number of hidden costs need to be reviewed for adoption of a company or a company.
Some of these content management systems from the need, the data from the Web. CNet, for example, one of them in the House of content management systems and yarn in a vignette. Since its publication on the Internet in 1995 to increase the development of these systems are really go. But my work is focused on the open source Web Content Management sytaLlosa.
The first open-source, I would like the name DotNetNuke (http://www. dotnetnuke.com), a AsP.Net. Far one of the most popular open source projects, DotNetNuke has an avid following of hundreds of thousands of users. The advantages of using this system is a rapid adjustment of the Plataforma and intensive support they receive from the community. These are two very important factors in evaluating a system of open sources of the deactualizaciones and support they received from the author or the users of the platform. In addition to the Innovations in this system, a powerful application of any measure. For example, the evaluation mechanism is by far one of the easiest to modify and adapt the programming and the limited number of tasks adore to receive a side weaving.
DotNetNuke is not without drawbacks. Since then, the Systementwickelt ASP.Net, it means that you have at least Visual Studio 2003 Professional or higher to make the source and the system under your bedürfnissen. That can be a disadvantage, since the cost of the development platform can honderdenos dollars.
The second open source system, I have some experience in the use of AXCMS.Net hot (http://www.axcms.net) in the platform. NHE. This system is that the kingdom of Other open-source systems such as DotNetNuke. But this system has drawbacks. Initially a little difficult for the installation and deployment issues that each project be seriously undermined. Moreover There is no pairECE is a strong user DotNetNuke. Nevertheless, the system as a "fixed" when you're rewarded for your efforts, once the system is fully installed and ready for use. Secondly, because this system estvraiment an opportunity on the development team all updates or adjustments to May, for a right of the creator of this system. This fact prevents the support of the community and the approval of the system, which makes it much more difficult.
There are many other open-source systems with more developed as I write this. The main factors, the introduction of an open source content management systems take into account sontQuelist this system for the support of the community and the timeliness of your heart of the development team. Even an open source system can aggregate number of hidden costs need to be reviewed for adoption of a company or a company.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น